巅峰对决P5000 VS G7
在国外网站找到了Peter Bendheim 发表的G7与P5000的对比照片。
This is not scientific; just two images taken one after the other on the G7 and P5000 off my patio.
Both taken at at ISO 200, standard exposures using Aperture priority as close to f4 as possible, no EV, no post processing, just reduced to 1200 pixels across.
There's nothing in in; just some marginal exposure variation(the Nikon image is mariginally overexposed in the high contrast areas)
Really too close to call. Hardly surprising seeing they have the same CCD.
They are both not bad cameras.
More when I have the time.
以上英文不是很清楚什么意思。。。。呵呵
一下是网友的讨论：
观点一：If you pixel peep, the second one seems better: the foreground grass and background tree are more realistic.（译文）如果你的象素差不多的话，我觉得G7的更好，前景的草地和背景的树显得更加真实。
观点二：Very difficult to see differences in these 2 shots...P5000 looks ’’a tiny touch’’ sharper (is this the case? Difficult to say on my screen)... （译文）很难区分两者的区别，P5000的相片显得更加锐利（不知道是不是这样，很难在我的电脑屏幕上看出来）－－（不知道有没翻译错）
观点三： Because I live here, a visual inspection says that 1st image is more color-true, the later, more vivid.
Either way, they are minor color tweaks you can set in camera or in post.
Both are pretty OK for out-of-camera shots. -- Peter Bendheim
作者说：因为我住在这里，直觉告诉我尼康P5000的颜色还原的更真实，G7的拍出来的照片显得更加生动些（注：可能是说G7拍的色彩更浓郁些吧）不管怎么说，两者可能因为设置差异而导致画质有轻微的差别，不过二者都是好相机。
观点四：To my eyes pic #1 looks slightly crisper and more detailed. I'm not pixel peeping, it just looks a littler "realer" to me.
For me these type of landscape/architecture pics are a better test of IQ than close ups.
Thanks for posting the pics.
我的眼睛告诉我，尼康P5000更新鲜（注：不知道crisper该做何解释好），我只是觉得P5000显得稍微真实些。（注：大意）两者的相片质量比较接近，分辨差别跟IQ测试有的一拼。
